The Strength of Indemnities
The High Court in Western Cape ruled, during December 2014, that indemnities used by dive businesses / operators are indeed not beyond reproach.
(https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Victory-for-widow-in-shark-cage-dive-case-20141228 ).
In 2008, a vessel, carrying tourists on route from a shark diving trip was hit by a wave. It capsized and 3 people drowned.
The court ruled that a defense based on the fact that a tourist signed an indemnity was not sufficient and held the company and the skipper, liable. The cause of action revolved around the negligence for failing to notice deterioration in sailing conditions.
Although there are early indications of an appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal, the legal fraternity has (in our view correctly so), already added: “It is forcing businesses to rethink their indemnity methods”. From our earlier discussions (available in the Alert Diver Magazine - http://goo.gl/JAkBQM page 40), the strength of total reliance on an indemnity has already been questioned. This decision lends strength to that thought. In our view, liability for negligence cannot just be indemnified by an agreement.
The business / operator and its staff still need to take due care, more so given the fact that we are in the high risk business of diving. At this stage the actual law report is not yet available. It will be fully discussed and commented on in our next edition. However, if you have any enquiries or questions, you are most welcome to address them to DANSA, who shall respond to them as comprehensively as possible.
From a practical standpoint, we would like to encourage Dive Operators, Resorts and Businesses to participate in the DAN Dive Safety Partners (http://www.dansa.org/industry-partners.htm ) and DAN Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment programmes (http://goo.gl/nOQZcC ). This will allow them to address potential safety issues pro-actively and objectively – not only to reduce their potential liability, but also towards achieving the greater objective of making diving safer and incident-free.
(https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Victory-for-widow-in-shark-cage-dive-case-20141228 ).
In 2008, a vessel, carrying tourists on route from a shark diving trip was hit by a wave. It capsized and 3 people drowned.
The court ruled that a defense based on the fact that a tourist signed an indemnity was not sufficient and held the company and the skipper, liable. The cause of action revolved around the negligence for failing to notice deterioration in sailing conditions.
Although there are early indications of an appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal, the legal fraternity has (in our view correctly so), already added: “It is forcing businesses to rethink their indemnity methods”. From our earlier discussions (available in the Alert Diver Magazine - http://goo.gl/JAkBQM page 40), the strength of total reliance on an indemnity has already been questioned. This decision lends strength to that thought. In our view, liability for negligence cannot just be indemnified by an agreement.
The business / operator and its staff still need to take due care, more so given the fact that we are in the high risk business of diving. At this stage the actual law report is not yet available. It will be fully discussed and commented on in our next edition. However, if you have any enquiries or questions, you are most welcome to address them to DANSA, who shall respond to them as comprehensively as possible.
From a practical standpoint, we would like to encourage Dive Operators, Resorts and Businesses to participate in the DAN Dive Safety Partners (http://www.dansa.org/industry-partners.htm ) and DAN Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment programmes (http://goo.gl/nOQZcC ). This will allow them to address potential safety issues pro-actively and objectively – not only to reduce their potential liability, but also towards achieving the greater objective of making diving safer and incident-free.
Posted in Alert Diver Summer Editions, Dive Safety FAQ
Posted in Liability releases, Indemnity form, Courtactions, Legal advice
Posted in Liability releases, Indemnity form, Courtactions, Legal advice
Categories
2024
February
March
April
May
October
My name is Rosanne… DAN was there for me?My name is Pam… DAN was there for me?My name is Nadia… DAN was there for me?My name is Morgan… DAN was there for me?My name is Mark… DAN was there for me?My name is Julika… DAN was there for me?My name is James Lewis… DAN was there for me?My name is Jack… DAN was there for me?My name is Mrs. Du Toit… DAN was there for me?My name is Sean… DAN was there for me?My name is Clayton… DAN was there for me?My name is Claire… DAN was there for me?My name is Lauren… DAN was there for me?My name is Amos… DAN was there for me?My name is Kelly… DAN was there for me?Get to Know DAN Instructor: Mauro JijeGet to know DAN Instructor: Sinda da GraçaGet to know DAN Instructor: JP BarnardGet to know DAN instructor: Gregory DriesselGet to know DAN instructor Trainer: Christo van JaarsveldGet to Know DAN Instructor: Beto Vambiane
November
Get to know DAN Instructor: Dylan BowlesGet to know DAN instructor: Ryan CapazorioGet to know DAN Instructor: Tyrone LubbeGet to know DAN Instructor: Caitlyn MonahanScience Saves SharksSafety AngelsDiving Anilao with Adam SokolskiUnderstanding Dive Equipment RegulationsDiving With A PFOUnderwater NavigationFinding My PassionDiving Deep with DSLRDebunking Freediving MythsCryptic FishImmersion Pulmonary OedemaSwimmer's EarMEMBER PROFILE: RAY DALIOAdventure Auntie: Yvette OosthuizenClean Our OceansWhat to Look for in a Dive Boat
2023
January
March
Terrific Freedive ModeKaboom!....The Big Oxygen Safety IssueScuba Nudi ClothingThe Benefits of Being BaldDive into Freedive InstructionCape Marine Research and Diver DevelopmentThe Inhaca Ocean Alliance.“LIGHTS, Film, Action!”Demo DiversSpecial Forces DiverWhat Dive Computers Don\'t Know | PART 2Toughing It Out Is Dangerous
April
July
August
No Comments