Sharks Aquatic vs. Sparks Atmospheric
Great!!!! We have just received a question from a DAN SA member about a comment in my lecture on Hazardous Marine Life Injuries (HMLI).
By the way, you can click here for HMLI Part 1 and here for HMLI Part 2 on Youtube.
In the section on shark attacks I say something along the lines that "people are 17x more likely to be struck by lightning than bitten by sharks... "
The concern was that the statistic isn't valid since the population at risk of shark attacks are in the ocean, and it is therefore much smaller than those exposed to lightning.
I was delighted to receive the question! This is fun, and valuable! In fact, we invite you to listen with open but questioning minds! So, please keep the questions coming!
In response: The statistical criticism is partly right and partly wrong: Lightning is not experienced every day, everywhere, and - even when it occurs - not everyone is outside (exposed) during a thunderstorm. So there is no way of knowing exactly how many people are actually lightning-exposed vs. shark exposed. Also, note that the shark attacks were not limited only to scuba divers, but all who enter the ocean. So, it may actually be a similar number of individuals exposed to either, and some to both.
Therefore, the philosophical basis of the criticism is certainly valid, but the numerical argument is presumptive. In terms of actual data from our own DAN SA data over 20 years: We have had no DAN members bitten by sharks and one DAN member struck by lightning - and survived (I actually took the call!). So, from our data set: the chance of a DAN SA member being bitten by a shark is incalculably small relative to being struck by lightning.
Lastly, the statistic given was simply based on global, annual reported numbers for injuries from sharks aquatic vs. sparks atmospheric!
Hope that helps!
By the way, you can click here for HMLI Part 1 and here for HMLI Part 2 on Youtube.
In the section on shark attacks I say something along the lines that "people are 17x more likely to be struck by lightning than bitten by sharks... "
The concern was that the statistic isn't valid since the population at risk of shark attacks are in the ocean, and it is therefore much smaller than those exposed to lightning.
I was delighted to receive the question! This is fun, and valuable! In fact, we invite you to listen with open but questioning minds! So, please keep the questions coming!
In response: The statistical criticism is partly right and partly wrong: Lightning is not experienced every day, everywhere, and - even when it occurs - not everyone is outside (exposed) during a thunderstorm. So there is no way of knowing exactly how many people are actually lightning-exposed vs. shark exposed. Also, note that the shark attacks were not limited only to scuba divers, but all who enter the ocean. So, it may actually be a similar number of individuals exposed to either, and some to both.
Therefore, the philosophical basis of the criticism is certainly valid, but the numerical argument is presumptive. In terms of actual data from our own DAN SA data over 20 years: We have had no DAN members bitten by sharks and one DAN member struck by lightning - and survived (I actually took the call!). So, from our data set: the chance of a DAN SA member being bitten by a shark is incalculably small relative to being struck by lightning.
Lastly, the statistic given was simply based on global, annual reported numbers for injuries from sharks aquatic vs. sparks atmospheric!
Hope that helps!
Posted in Dive Safety FAQ
Categories
2024
February
March
April
May
October
My name is Rosanne… DAN was there for me?My name is Pam… DAN was there for me?My name is Nadia… DAN was there for me?My name is Morgan… DAN was there for me?My name is Mark… DAN was there for me?My name is Julika… DAN was there for me?My name is James Lewis… DAN was there for me?My name is Jack… DAN was there for me?My name is Mrs. Du Toit… DAN was there for me?My name is Sean… DAN was there for me?My name is Clayton… DAN was there for me?My name is Claire… DAN was there for me?My name is Lauren… DAN was there for me?My name is Amos… DAN was there for me?My name is Kelly… DAN was there for me?Get to Know DAN Instructor: Mauro JijeGet to know DAN Instructor: JP BarnardGet to know DAN Instructor: Sinda da GraçaGet to know DAN instructor Trainer: Christo van JaarsveldGet to know DAN instructor: Gregory DriesselGet to Know DAN Instructor: Beto Vambiane
November
Get to know DAN Instructor: Dylan BowlesGet to know DAN instructor: Ryan CapazorioGet to know DAN Instructor: Tyrone LubbeGet to know DAN Instructor Trainer: Christo van JaarsveldGet to know DAN Instructor: Caitlyn MonahanSafety AngelsDiving With A PFODiving Anilao with Adam SokolskiScience Saves SharksUnderwater NavigationUnderstanding Dive Equipment Regulations
2023
January
March
Terrific Freedive ModeKaboom!....The Big Oxygen Safety IssueScuba Nudi ClothingThe Benefits of Being BaldDive into Freedive InstructionCape Marine Research and Diver DevelopmentThe Inhaca Ocean Alliance.“LIGHTS, Film, Action!”Demo DiversSpecial Forces DiverWhat Dive Computers Don\'t Know | PART 2Toughing It Out Is Dangerous
April
July
August
September
Mismatched Scuba Valves to Cylinder OutletsUnderwater Crime Scene InvestigatorsDive Boat Etiquette – From Yachts to rubber ducksTravel Smarter: Personal Safety While TravelingLiability in ContextLearning from Success. Learning from MistakeDive in the Fast Lane with DPVsKwaZulu Natal shipwrecks: The ProduceAvoid Diving With EarplugsThe Parting Shot
No Comments